Texas federal judge Reed O'Connor announced on Friday that a hearing will be held on August 28 on the criminal settlement agreement reached between the Department of Justice and Boeing Co. (BA.US). The agreement, if approved, would protect the aerospace giant from being sued over two 737 MAX crashes, but it has faced strong opposition from the families of the victims.

Under the terms of the agreement, Boeing pleaded guilty last year to a criminal fraud charge for misleading U.S. regulators about a critical flight control system for the 737 MAX. In exchange, the Justice Department agreed to lift the independent watchdog's oversight of Boeing within three years. This arrangement has caused controversy - two air crashes involving Indonesia's Lion Air in 2018 and Ethiopian Airlines in 2019 killed a total of 346 people. Some family members believed that the agreement was "not in the public interest" and accused Boeing of not being fully held accountable for its responsibilities.
Judge O'Connor specifically stated in the hearing schedule that he would hear statements from all parties on "whether it is reasonable to dismiss the charges." It is worth noting that in 2023, he characterized Boeing's crimes as "the deadliest corporate crime in American history." At this hearing, the families of the victims asked the court to refuse to approve the agreement. If the Ministry of Justice insists on withdrawing the case, a special prosecutor should be appointed to continue pursuing accountability.
Financial arrangements show that Boeing will pay a total settlement of US$1.1 billion, of which US$243.6 million is a new fine, US$444.5 million will be injected into the air crash victims fund, and the remaining funds will be used to strengthen the compliance and safety system. The Justice Department emphasized that the vast majority of families have received "billions of dollars" in compensation through civil lawsuits, but the exact amount of compensation for each victim's family has not been disclosed.
Boeing insists that the survival of criminal charges should be decided by the executive branch and that the courts have no power to intervene. Behind this legal game, it reflects the complex balance between corporate responsibility, judicial supervision and the rights of victims. As the hearing approaches, whether Boeing can completely escape criminal liability will become an important benchmark for global aviation safety regulation.