Recently, a female car owner who defended her rights on the roof of the car at the Shanghai Auto Show announced the details of the trial in which Tesla sued her for RMB 5 million for reputational infringement. The female car owner said that during the trial, Judge Chen Qiang kept asking me a key question: Is the brake failure I claimed was my subjective judgment? Or have you confirmed that you have a solid basis?
The female car owner said,If someone at Tesla had explicitly admitted that the brakes failed, the case would not need to be tried. He would directly declare the plaintiff Tesla to lose the case in court.
As for the "brake failure" case, the female car owner said: The driving data recording was verbally reported by the Tesla after-sales manager during the call on February 27, 21. I have submitted this recording to the court as evidence (see Defendant’s Evidence Group 4, No. 11 for details). I released this recording before the rights protection at the auto show in March 21.
The data reported verbally by Tesla staff showed that ABS occurred 2.7 seconds after the brakes were applied. On dry and flat roads, ABSIn a normal Tesla, ABS will only occur when the brakes are applied hard. Since it is applied hard, why is the braking distance so long?
The ABS is turned on, but the brake deceleration is much lower than that of a normal vehicle. Isn't this a brake failure?
If the brakes had not failed, two years later, Tesla would have been able to produce complete data to prove that the brakes were fine.
Why doesn't Tesla offer it? If Tesla proactively provided data from the beginning, would the Shanghai Auto Show roof rights protection incident on April 19, 2021 still happen?
During the rights protection incident that year, the State Administration of Supervision and the China Consumers Association both spoke out, and the State Administration also ordered Tesla to provide complete data directly and unconditionally. It’s been three years, where’s the data? Does Tesla offer it?