A businessman in Guangzhou was attacked by the same buyer in Yantai, Shandong within six months.Maliciously "refund only" 225 times using the "exchange order + interception of express delivery" method, resulting in a loss of over 50,000 yuan.. It is understood that every time a woman places an order, she buys low-priced (more than ten yuan) and high-priced (hundreds or thousands of yuan) products at the same time, creating the illusion of normal consumption.
When the express delivery is not signed for,Apply for "refund only" for high-priced goods, apply for "intercept express delivery" at the same time, and use loopholes in platform rules to obtain refunds.
After receiving the intercepted package, tear off the low-priced product label and paste it on the packaging of the high-priced product, and return the low-priced product as a high-priced product.
Merchant warehouses defaulted to "the outer packaging is intact" when intercepting returned packages and did not unpack them for verification, allowing the scam to go undetected for half a year.
Later, when she repeated her old tricks,Due to negligent operation, the order sheet was not affixed securely, revealing the original product information, and the merchant was called to the police for accountability.At this time, she realized that the situation was serious. Although she took the initiative to contact the company to transfer compensation and asked for settlement, she was clearly rejected.
Today, the seller "Miss Shi" once again spoke out publicly, announcing the follow-up progress of the matter and three issues that netizens are concerned about.
She said: After confirmation by the investigators,The buyer involved, "Ms. Liu", was brought to justice on December 8. The police station in the jurisdiction has also formally filed the case and is taking it very seriously. We will fully cooperate with the investigation in the future..
"Regarding Ms. Liu from Yantai, Shandong, I must make it clear: this incident only targets her personal behavior. She cannot represent either Shandong or Yantai. She is just an independent individual among thousands of living beings. The individual's choice should be her own responsibility and has nothing to do with the region."
So will she forgive Ms. Liu? The seller also gave his own answer:
From September 2024 to November 2025, for 14 months, Ms. Liu defrauded me of a total of 556 orders, and the amount involved was as high as 90,000 yuan (the data is only based on the query results of known mobile phone numbers).
At first I thought it was just an ordinary "wool harvest", but I didn't think it was a long-standing fraud.
For me, this matter has nothing to do with understanding, let alone resentment - it is a social problem that many businesses may encounter, and it reflects the reality that a few people take risks due to greed. I hope this case can alert more people:The bottom line of the law cannot be touched. Any attempt to take advantage of loopholes will eventually result in a corresponding price..
