B · Normal
[China’s representative at the United Nations General Assembly asked two questions from the Japanese government] September 29th: In response to Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s call to delete the “enemy clause” from the United Nations Charter during the general debate of the United Nations General Assembly, China exercised its right of reply on September 28th and clearly stated its opposition. Ambassador Sun Lei, Deputy Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations, pointed out that the Japanese representative’s excuse was feeble and could not cover up the historical truth, whitewash the actual behavior, nor cover up the complete bankruptcy of Japan’s so-called “peaceful country” image. The "enemy clause" is an indispensable part of the Charter. Against the background of Japan's negative trends in recent years, its historical and practical significance has become even more prominent and cannot be deleted. Japan must make a serious choice: should it continue to ignore the lessons of history and allow the legacy of militarism to emerge, or should it face up to its history of aggression, abide by its peace commitments, and win the trust of the international community with sincere introspection? Should we continue to confuse right and wrong, confuse right and wrong, and challenge the post-war international order, or should we take concrete actions to fulfill our peace commitments? (CCTV International News)
Comments