Intel has officially released the new Core Ultra200 series of CPUs. It is also the first time that the Ultra name is used on the desktop. However, the new name brings a lot of trouble. The original Core i7/i5/i3 are gone and replaced by Ultra plus a more complex numerical code. So is there any way to quickly distinguish them?
In fact, if you summarize the new products, you can find that the new Core naming is still a fixed template. UltraX corresponds to the original i5/i7, followed by a 3-digit number plus a suffix. The first digit is 2, representing the second generation, the second digit represents the positioning, the last digit is 5, and the suffix continues the previous definition.
In other words, to determine its positioning, it is enough to look at the number in the middle. It seems that there is no pattern from 0 to 8, but it is actually very simple. Just +1 and then correspond to the original naming. Because there are not many 14th generation Core products, they can correspond to the 13th generation Core. The overall idea remains the same.
For example, Ultra9285K, after +1 operation is performed on the middle number 8, the result is 9, which corresponds to the Core i9-13900K; another example is Ultra7265KF, after +1 operation is performed on the middle number 6, 7 is obtained, which corresponds to the original Core i7-13700KF. Isn't it much simpler?
There is only one special case here which is the Core Ultra3215. Because the previous Core has not had a product like the 13200, it can be regarded as a new product, and the number of core threads is consistent with the Ultra3205. It is speculated that it is its slightly increased frequency version.