On August 16, Jikrypton’s Legal Department posted on Weibo to clarify the collision test video of Jikrypton 007 and Xiaomi SU7 previously released by car bloggers. Jikrypton said that after verification, it has not cooperated with any individual or institution for such testing, and does not agree with or participate in any "pull-and-step" marketing that "discredits friendly businessmen". At the same time, it resolutely resists and opposes any behavior suspected of "unfair competition."
On August 13, car blogger Gao Ruoxiang posted a video of the collision test between Xiaomi SU7 and Jikrypton 007 on social media. At the same time, a large number of rumors and guidance content appeared online, calling this test a "paid test." In this regard, Jikrypton stated after clarification that Jikrypton reserves the right to pursue legal liability of relevant parties for false information.
In the test video, the blogger pointed out that the windows and doors of the Ji Krypton 007 could be opened after a collision, while the Xiaomi SU7 experienced a small battery power outage, automatic emergency call system failure, and the door could not be opened. Xiaomi later stated that it had noticed the relevant information. After analysis, Xiaomi believes that this so-called "test" is not rigorously set up, the records are incomplete, and the conclusions are unscientific.