U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed to the media in the Oval Office of the White House on the 6th that he had personally submitted an application to FIFA President Gianni Infantino, requesting a re-examination of the red card received by the United States men's national football team forward Balogun in the previous game. At present, the FIFA Disciplinary Committee has made a rare decision to suspend the execution of Balogun's ban. This unprecedented political intervention in sports ruling immediately caused huge controversy in the international football community.

In an interview, Trump expressed strong dissatisfaction with the referee's penalty on the spot, claiming that the penalty was extremely unfair. Trump pointed out that the foul that resulted in Balogun receiving the red card was essentially just an ordinary collision between two athletes running at full speed and was not a violation. He emphasized that he only submitted a review application to FIFA and did not directly interfere with its internal decision-making. At the same time, he praised FIFA's suspension of the ban as an "extremely wise decision."

This highly controversial ruling quickly thrust FIFA's disciplinary proceedings into the forefront of public opinion. FIFA's decision sparked an outcry from Belgium as the United States will face Belgium in the 2026 World Cup quarter-finals on Monday for a spot in the quarter-finals. The Belgian national team and relevant football officials publicly condemned FIFA's violation of the fairness of competition rules, saying that this move seriously damaged the credibility and sportsmanship of the World Cup.

Sports analysts generally believe that it is extremely rare in the history of modern football for leaders to directly intervene in the disciplinary punishment of red cards in top international events. Although the United States insists that this move is aimed at ensuring that "the best player can appear on the field," FIFA's practice of breaking the "automatic suspension of red cards" due to political pressure may set a dangerous precedent for future international sports event penalties and dispute resolution mechanisms.