Telegraph

7x24 real-time news feed, auto refreshBeijing Time:

B
[Sponsors, spouses, relatives, etc. are not allowed to hold shares of the issuer in any name or manner] On October 9, the reporter learned that the China Securities Association has recently drafted the "Code of Conduct for Sponsor Representatives" and is soliciting opinions from the industry. The new regulations clarify that sponsors, other persons engaged in the sponsorship business, and their spouses are not allowed to hold shares of the issuer in any name or manner, including direct shareholding in their own name, shareholding through relatives, pseudonyms, agency holdings, etc., as well as disguised shareholding through trusts, entrusted investments, partnership shares, asset management plans, contractual private equity funds, etc. This also includes obtaining shares of companies to be listed for interested parties, and illegal participation in strategic allotments and price lock-in increases. The new regulations also extend the scope of the prohibition to the entire business cycle. Illegal shares are not allowed in all aspects of project establishment, due diligence, preparation of application documents, review and inquiry responses, and continuous supervision after listing. Two hidden forms are specifically named. It is not allowed to take shares in the proposed sponsor company through "pre-investment" or "locking in the target in advance" before the project is officially established. It is not allowed to obtain improper equity returns through retroactive interest arrangements after the project is terminated and the continuous supervision period is over. (Reporter Lin Jian)
#Brokerage news10-09 11:57
B
[In the first half of the year, securities firms raised RMB 540 billion in science and technology innovation, with a total of nearly RMB 40 billion in follow-up investment] On October 8, reporters learned that the China Securities Association issued the latest analysis of the securities industry’s operating conditions in the first half of this year to securities firms. Among them, in terms of science and technology innovation: in the first half of the year, the entire industry provided financing for science and technology innovation enterprises through IPOs, technological innovation bonds and other financial instruments, exceeding 540 billion yuan, of which 56 companies were listed on the "Two Innovation Boards" and the Beijing Stock Exchange, achieving financing of 41.673 billion yuan; underwriting 553 technological innovation bonds (or management ABS), with an underwriting amount of 500.078 billion yuan. As strategic investors, securities companies and their alternative subsidiaries participated in the "Two Innovation Boards" and the Beijing Stock Exchange IPO follow-up investment of 860 million yuan, with a cumulative investment scale of nearly 40 billion yuan, accompanying the growth of scientific and technological enterprises with their own funds. As of the end of June, the scale of existing products of private equity subsidiaries of securities companies was 693.693 billion yuan, an increase of 7.88% from the end of the previous year, guiding the flow of social capital to fields and industries with growth potential. (Reporter Lin Jian)
B
[Adjustment of rating indicators for securities companies’ cultural construction, theoretical research, chief economist’s voice, etc. are included in bonus points] On September 30, reporters learned that the China Securities Association recently solicited opinions from securities companies on the "Practice Evaluation Methods for Securities Company Culture Construction" and the revised draft of evaluation indicators. The "Measures" were revised for the first time, and the indicators were revised for the third time, and they were systematic revisions. After the revision, the indicator system was reconstructed into six categories: political guidance of party building, honest business management, compliance and sound operation, role play of think tanks, industry image shaping, and guarantee system implementation. The basic indicators were streamlined from the original 51 to 38. Two new points have been added to the bonus points: first, the effectiveness of party organization building, extra points for the party organization that has been fully developed and grassroots party members rated as excellent; second, standardized operation and management, extra points for companies that have not been subject to administrative penalties, regulatory measures and self-discipline management for three or more years in the past five years. Theoretical research, the positive voice of the chief economist, and cultural construction achievements being reported by the central media are combined into think tank and publicity bonus points. Point deductions have been increased simultaneously, and special indicators for punishment have been added. Companies subject to supervision or self-discipline penalties for issues such as integrity and professional ethics will be deducted points. Employees who are punished for stock trading and other issues will also be deducted points. For the first time, points will be deducted for excessive salary incentives. For example, 0.2 points will be deducted for per capita salary increase and net profit increase of less than 20%, and 1 point will be deducted for 30% and above. In addition, honest work plays a decisive role in personnel assessment and promotion, and has been adjusted from the original bonus item to a key matter that must be implemented. (Reporter Lin Jian)
#Brokerage news09-30 17:33
B
[China Securities Association disclosed the "Five Big Articles" practice cases of securities companies in finance, and 6 securities firms were selected] On September 29th, the Securities Association of China recently announced the excellent practice cases of securities company subsidiaries in implementing the "Five Big Articles" in finance and strengthening compliance and risk control management. Among them, there are 6 cases of implementing the "Five Big Articles" in finance, namely Orient Securities, Guosen Securities, Capital Securities, China Merchants Securities, Zheshang Securities, and CITIC Securities. Specifically, the case selected by Orient Securities is "Creating a new engine for empowering asset management, investment and research based on AI large models"; Guosen Securities is "Guosen Asset Management assisted State Power Investment Corporation to successfully issue the country's first carbon-reducing and emission-reducing green electricity alternative REITs"; Beijing Capital Securities is "anchoring the development of digital finance and building an independent operation system - an excellent practical case of digital finance for the credit innovation project of Capital Securities Asset Management Operation Management System"; China Merchants Securities is "an early firm investment" "Facilitating the rise of domestic DRAM - the case of investment in Changxin Memory"; Zheshang Securities is "A practical case of Zheshang Securities Investment Co., Ltd.'s implementation of the financial 'Five Big Articles'"; CITIC Securities is "creating green momentum through group collaboration and promoting dual carbon implementation with capital empowerment". (Reporter Chen Junlan)
B
[An employee of Zhongtai Securities lost RMB 92 million in trading on behalf of clients and was given a warning and a fine of RMB 500,000] On September 19, the Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau recently issued an administrative penalty decision [2026] No. 12 (Yang Wenming). It launched an investigation into Yang Wenming’s behavior of privately accepting client entrustment to buy and sell securities, and informed the parties of the facts, reasons, and basis for the administrative penalty as well as the rights of the parties in accordance with the law. The party concerned did not make any statement or defense, nor did it request a hearing. The investigation and handling of this case have now been concluded. It was found that Yang Wenming had the following illegal facts: During the period involved, Yang Wenming was an employee of Zhongtai Securities. From October 10, 2017 to November 30, 2017, from April 24, 2020 to January 14, 2021, and from November 3, 2022 to January 4, 2024, Yang Wenming accepted Tan’s entrustment and operated Zhang’s ordinary account by issuing trading instructions. The total transaction amount was 191,297,302.35 yuan, and the book loss was 1,829,166.02 yuan; from November 10, 2017 to March 6, 2024, Yang Wenming accepted Tan entrusted Zhang to operate Zhang's credit securities account by issuing trading instructions, with a cumulative transaction of 2,338,310,202.05 yuan and an actual loss of 90,233,071.69 yuan. The aforesaid two accounts had cumulative transactions of 2,529,607,504.40 yuan, with a total book loss of 92,062,237.71 yuan. Yang Wenming did not generate any illegal income during the period of accepting the entrustment. Yang Wenming's above-mentioned behavior violated the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 136 of the Securities Law, and constituted the behavior of employees of securities companies privately accepting entrustment from customers to buy and sell securities as described in Article 210 of the Securities Law. The Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau decided to give Yang Wenming a warning and impose a fine of 500,000 yuan.
#Brokerage news09-19 19:23
B
[New regulations for stress testing of securities trading and settlement systems are about to be implemented Critical information infrastructure units must be tested at least twice] On September 19, reporters learned that the "Guidelines for Stress Testing of Securities Company Transaction Settlement Systems (Trial)" are about to be implemented, and the China Securities Association is currently performing relevant procedures. Since soliciting opinions in September 2025, the "Guidelines" have been revised once, and the final version will formally put forward clear requirements for the stability of the securities industry's transaction settlement systems, thereby enhancing the reliability of the system. The "Guidelines" are expected to implement a number of hard measures: securities companies at least every year Conduct a stress test of the transaction settlement system at least twice a year for critical information infrastructure units; timely supplementary testing is required in five types of situations such as major system changes and large market fluctuations; securities firms should attach great importance to the system stress test results. If they find that system performance does not meet standards or there are major risks, they should report it in a timely manner and formulate a clear rectification plan within a time limit. The implementation of the new regulations aims to identify bottlenecks in the capacity and performance of the transaction settlement system, improve system stability guarantee capabilities, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of investors. (Reporter Lin Jian)
B
[Consolidated management of the securities industry enters a critical period] September 19th, as the securities industry’s collectivization and integrated operations accelerate, securities companies are incorporating domestic and foreign subsidiaries into the same “risk control map.” Reporters recently learned from the industry that the Securities Association of China conducted a special survey on consolidated management to the Risk Management Professional Committee in the early stage and formed a research report. The report shows that since the release of the "Guidelines for the Consolidated Management of Securities Companies (Trial)" in April 2025, most securities firms have established a basic framework for consolidated management and have entered the stage of tackling key areas as a whole. Under the transition period arrangement of 1 to 3 years, there are obvious differences in the pace of advancement among institutions. The report suggests that after the consolidated risk control indicators are stable, research can be conducted to allow qualified securities firms to implement risk control indicator supervision on a consolidated basis, guide institutions to allocate capital flexibly and efficiently, and promote a healthy balance between risk management and business development; at the same time, a dynamic evaluation mechanism for consolidated risk control indicators should be established in a timely manner to truly realize "where the risks are, supervision will extend to them" and lay a solid institutional foundation for the high-quality development of the industry. (China Securities News)